Maybe the customer does not
agreed with such explain unless we have enough objective evidence.
Thanks and best regards,
Justin
From:
TGAsia [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Joseph
Ho
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012
2:00 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TGAsia] Solder Mask
Coating
I see that the IPC
concern on the function, e.g. blister, void may have problem in flakes by tape
test
And if the patches are
not solder flux, oil and cleaning agent, the risk of S/M peel off after
assembling is very low.
So they should be
acceptable.
Best
Regards,
Senior
Quality System Manager, QS and LEAN
[log in to unmask]" align=baseline
border=0>
Multek
Display Limited
Tel
: (86) 755 2862 0888 Ext.269
Endless innovation
creates changes for tomorrow
From:
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012
12:35 PM
To:
Subject: RE: [TGAsia] Solder Mask
Coating
Thanks Joseph. They are gone
through the reflow process and passed to FPT/FCT test and no blistering and/or
void was found. However, they are still violated the IPC standard clause 10.7.2
(Defect –Class 2, 3).
What’s your comment?
Thanks and best regards,
Justin
From:
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012
12:15 PM
To:
Subject: RE: [TGAsia] Solder Mask
Coating
Justin,
If the stuffs under the
S/M didn’t enlarge, swell or causing S/M peel-off after reflow, it should
be acceptable,
From the photos, it
seems that they are not blister and void.
In the S/M process, the
copper surface is fresh and may easy be oxides or show dark pad if they hold in
the line for a longer time. These patches will appear only after the S/M
curing.
Ask your PCB supplier to
provide you the reliability test result or go through the reflow process with
them.
Best
Regards,
Senior
Quality System Manager, QS and LEAN
[log in to unmask]" align=baseline
border=0>
Multek
Display Limited
Tel
: (86) 755 2862 0888 Ext.269
Endless innovation
creates changes for tomorrow
From:
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012
12:09 PM
To:
Subject: RE: [TGAsia] Solder Mask
Coating
Thanks Joseph. So, is this s/b
reject as per IPC-A-610E standard clause 10.7.2?
[log in to unmask]">
Thanks and best regards,
Justin
From:
TGAsia [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012
12:03 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TGAsia] Solder Mask
Coating
Cleanliness problem in
S/M coating process.
Best
Regards,
Senior
Quality System Manager, QS and LEAN
[log in to unmask]" align=baseline
border=0>
Multek
Display Limited
Tel
: (86) 755 2862 0888 Ext.269
Endless innovation
creates changes for tomorrow
From:
TGAsia [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012
11:35 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TGAsia] Solder Mask
Coating
Hi All,
Would you please share with me your value experience
in solder mask coating? The photo as below:
[log in to unmask]" v:shapes="_x0000_s1032">[log in to unmask]" v:shapes="_x0000_s1031">[log in to unmask]">
[log in to unmask]" v:shapes="_x0000_s1028">It
seems to me that it s/b rejected as per IPC-A-610E standard clause 10.7.2.
Thanks in advance!
Best regards,
Justin
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 6887 (20120215) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
Legal Disclaimer: The information contained in this
message may be privileged and confidential. It is intended to be read only by
the individual or entity to whom it is addressed or by their designee. If the
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are on notice that
any distribution of this message, in any form, is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and
delete or destroy any copy of this message
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 6887 (20120215) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 6887 (20120215) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 6887 (20120215) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
Legal Disclaimer: The information contained in this
message may be privileged and confidential. It is intended to be read only by
the individual or entity to whom it is addressed or by their designee. If the
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are on notice that
any distribution of this message, in any form, is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and
delete or destroy any copy of this message
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 6887 (20120215) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 6887 (20120215) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
Legal Disclaimer: The information contained in this
message may be privileged and confidential. It is intended to be read only by
the individual or entity to whom it is addressed or by their designee. If the
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are on notice that
any distribution of this message, in any form, is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and
delete or destroy any copy of this message
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 6887 (20120215) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com