Maybe the customer does not agreed with such explain unless we have enough objective evidence.

 

Thanks and best regards,

 

Justin

 


From: TGAsia [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Joseph Ho
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 2:00 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TGAsia] Solder Mask Coating

 

I see that the IPC concern on the function, e.g. blister, void may have problem in flakes by tape test

And if the patches are not solder flux, oil and cleaning agent, the risk of S/M peel off after assembling is very low.

 

So they should be acceptable.

 

Best Regards,

 

Joseph Ho

Senior Quality System Manager, QS and LEAN

 

[log in to unmask]" align=baseline border=0> 

Multek Display Limited 

Tel    :  (86) 755 2862 0888 Ext.269
Mobile: (86) 138 25275770


Endless innovation creates changes for tomorrow


From: Justin Wu [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 12:35 PM
To: Joseph Ho; [log in to unmask]
Subject: RE: [TGAsia] Solder Mask Coating

 

Thanks Joseph. They are gone through the reflow process and passed to FPT/FCT test and no blistering and/or void was found. However, they are still violated the IPC standard clause 10.7.2 (Defect –Class 2, 3).

What’s your comment?

 

Thanks and best regards,

 

Justin

 


From: Joseph Ho [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 12:15 PM
To: Justin Wu; [log in to unmask]
Subject: RE: [TGAsia] Solder Mask Coating

 

Justin,

If the stuffs under the S/M didn’t enlarge, swell or causing S/M peel-off after reflow, it should be acceptable,

From the photos, it seems that they are not blister and void.

 

In the S/M process, the copper surface is fresh and may easy be oxides or show dark pad if they hold in the line for a longer time. These patches will appear only after the S/M curing.

 

Ask your PCB supplier to provide you the reliability test result or go through the reflow process with them.

 

 

 

Best Regards,

 

Joseph Ho

Senior Quality System Manager, QS and LEAN

 

[log in to unmask]" align=baseline border=0> 

Multek Display Limited 

Tel    :  (86) 755 2862 0888 Ext.269
Mobile: (86) 138 25275770


Endless innovation creates changes for tomorrow


From: Justin Wu [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 12:09 PM
To: Joseph Ho; [log in to unmask]
Subject: RE: [TGAsia] Solder Mask Coating

 

Thanks Joseph. So, is this s/b reject as per IPC-A-610E standard clause 10.7.2?

[log in to unmask]">

 

Thanks and best regards,

 

Justin

 


From: TGAsia [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Joseph Ho
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 12:03 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TGAsia] Solder Mask Coating

 

Cleanliness problem in S/M coating process.

 

Best Regards,

 

Joseph Ho

Senior Quality System Manager, QS and LEAN

 

[log in to unmask]" align=baseline border=0> 

Multek Display Limited 

Tel    :  (86) 755 2862 0888 Ext.269
Mobile: (86) 138 25275770


Endless innovation creates changes for tomorrow


From: TGAsia [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Justin Wu
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 11:35 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TGAsia] Solder Mask Coating

 

Hi All,

 

Would you please share with me your value experience in solder mask coating? The photo as below:

[log in to unmask]" v:shapes="_x0000_s1032">[log in to unmask]" v:shapes="_x0000_s1031">[log in to unmask]">

[log in to unmask]" v:shapes="_x0000_s1028">It seems to me that it s/b rejected as per IPC-A-610E standard clause 10.7.2.

 

Thanks in advance!

 

Best regards,

 

Justin



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 6887 (20120215) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________

Legal Disclaimer: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential. It is intended to be read only by the individual or entity to whom it is addressed or by their designee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are on notice that any distribution of this message, in any form, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete or destroy any copy of this message
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________


__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 6887 (20120215) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com


__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 6887 (20120215) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 6887 (20120215) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

Legal Disclaimer: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential. It is intended to be read only by the individual or entity to whom it is addressed or by their designee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are on notice that any distribution of this message, in any form, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete or destroy any copy of this message

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 6887 (20120215) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 6887 (20120215) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

Legal Disclaimer: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential. It is intended to be read only by the individual or entity to whom it is addressed or by their designee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are on notice that any distribution of this message, in any form, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete or destroy any copy of this message
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________


__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 6887 (20120215) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 6887 (20120215) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________