IPC-D-356 is not a requirements document. It is a description of the test data format. (and yes, they should stop using ET-652) Jack On Thu, 6 Jan 2011 08:23:14 -0500, Steven C Carter <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >If a Bare PCB manufacturer provides a Certificate of Compliance stating that >the PCB was electrically tested per IPC-ET-652 does meeting this standard by >default mean that they have also met the requirements of IPC-356? On a >related subject, should the vendor stop stating they have met ET-652 and >state that they have met 9252A? > >Thanks, Steve --------------------------------------------------- Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/ContentPage.aspx?Pageid=E-mail-Forums for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815 -----------------------------------------------------