Try one of the Kester product (Flux 979)
for better SIR test performance. Maybe cost you more but solves your problem.
SUPRAPTO SANTOSO
From: NG ENG
GUAN [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008
4:33 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TGAsia] 转发: The
effect of Flux residu e on PCB
Hi Leo,
No doubt , this is
caused by the flux. We had faced the same problem before .Our solution is to
clean up the flux.
From: TGAsia
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Leo
Yang
Sent: 26 September 2008 13:03
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TGAsia] 转发: The
effect of Flux residue on PCB
Importance: High
FYI
B/R
Leo Yang
IPC WOFE
21-54973435-616
From:
charles.lee [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008
11:51 AM
To: 'Asia Committe Task Group
Forum'
Subject: The effect of Flux
residue on PCB
Dear All,
Our customer complained us that flux
residue resulted in dielectric resistance reduction between two pads on PCB
(From 10Mohm to 3Kohm), please refer to the attached picture.
The flux we have been using is
No-clean type supplied by Union Soltek.
We are now puzzled with below
questions:
1)
What is the chemical substance around
these two pads? Is it only flux residue?
2)
Will the flux residue be able to
occur chemical reaction with solder mask after elapse of a long time?
3)
What is the root cause which results
in dielecric resistance variance?
We look forward to your expertised
explaination, thanks!
Best reagrds
Charles Lee