----- Original Message -----From: [log in to unmask] href="mailto:[log in to unmask]">Dennis ZhuTo: [log in to unmask] href="mailto:[log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 8:42 AMSubject: Re: [TGA] IPC-A-610DHi,曾和IPC Brave Li讨教过同样的问题,我们认为应该关注的是引脚和元件本体密封处的质量,而不是指引脚与绝缘层的密封处。ThanksDennis Zhu-----Original Message-----
From: TGAsia [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Zhang Meijuan
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 6:08 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TGA] IPC-A-610D1.在标准里面下图为可以接受,在正常的情况下,如果客户没有特殊要求,这个状况是可以接受的。
2.我认为引脚的密封处具体见下图红线位置。
-----Original Message-----
From: TGAsia [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Giles Liu
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 5:02 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TGA] 请教 IPC-A-610D
HI ALL:
IPC-A-610D 标准 第9章 第3节 关于径向弯月面瓷片电容损伤的判定要求,有一些疑问,.请各位赐教J
Questions:
1. 此图示是否可以接受?
2. 元件的引脚密封处指的是哪个位置?
TKS&RDGS
Giles.liu