In several studies I have seen this opposing BGA configuration resulted in fewer temp cycles to failure than when TC testing was run with only one side BGA attached. Qualitatively, this effect is likely to be more severe for "larger" BGAs on "thinner" boards. Best regards, Leo Leo M. Higgins III, Ph.D. Vice President, Technical Support Operations ASAT, Inc. 3755 Capital of Texas Highway, Suite 100 Austin, Texas 78704 office phone 512-383-4593 mobile 512-423-2002 [log in to unmask] www.asat.com The information contained in this electronic message is CUSTOMER/SUPPLIER PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution and copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by electronic mail. Thank you. -----Original Message----- From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Tempea, Ioan Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 8:30 AM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: [TN] Superposed BGAs Hi Technos, I am reviewing have a PCB design draft which has 2 MEG-Array BGA connectors from FCI. The problem is that one is on the topside and the second one on the bottom side, their locations perfectly overlapping. Otherwise said they one on top of the other. I remember having seen a thread on Technet a few years ago stating that this construction is not reliable. Unfortunately I cannot find the e-mails in the archive. What would be your take on this? Thank you, Ioan --------------------------------------------------- Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815 ----------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815 -----------------------------------------------------