Umm no, I have more to add ;-)
Since no soap will last forever and say your inline washer is consuming 4 to 9 GPH of wash water and @3 to 5 GPD of juice up the stack or dragged out

then opening the tank and getting blasted with hot juice, fiddling with other testing chemicals etc., then trying to figure out how much to add, etc, etc, etc

Another option to try instead of this hassle is to set up a dosing pump to auto inject your soap.
After a little $$ spent up front (very little) and set up time, this is a seamless operation.

Running an effective aqueous process is a daunting, time consuming task for some, why not simplify it as much as possible.

Anybody interested, call or write me.

Charlie
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Rudy Sedlak [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 3:48 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Saponifier Concentration More than you ever wanted to
know..

Mr. Ellis, and any others who have not tired of this discussion:

Everything you say about the weakness of pH as a measurement of cleaning MAY
be true....HOWEVER...pH will always remain a better instrument of measuring
cleaning power of a used cleaner solution than titration...

Titration measures quantity of alkali, and gives us no measure of type, or
quality...pH is a marker of type, or quality, and a rough measure of quantity...
I remind you of my previous example, that a very old, used cleaner solution
can titrate as full strength, and not be able to clean at all...yet, a properly
made up cleaner solution always cleans with the same activity at the same pH,
thus pH reflects cleaning activity...

Have we beaten this thing into the ground enough?

Rudy Sedlak
RD Chemical Company

In a message dated 9/24/03 8:37:13 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:

<< Rudy

 There is no pH endpoint, that is the whole problem. You speak as if a
 saponifier were just an unbuffered solution of MEA. From my experience
 of over 30 years of using buffered commercial saponifiers, I know they
 stop working long before there is a very noticeable drop of pH, and I'm
 quite categorical about that. I know of no MEA- or NaOH-based saponifier
 which will even think about working at pH 9.8 to 10 with an RMA/RA flux
 system. At that pH, you are generating white residues where there is flux.

 Brian

 Rudy Sedlak wrote:
 > When using a saponifier, the available alkalinity is a key part of
 > cleaning, not the "reserve" alkalinity...
 >
 > pH is a measure of available alkalinity...and it is important to
 > remember that since pH is a logarithmic function, a drop of one pH unit
 > means a drop of 90% of available alkalinity....
 >
 > Titration is a measure of reserve alkalinity....which might be of some
 > interest, but not on the next board that goes through the cleaner...
 > Remember, you really will never use all the alkalinity that is titrated,
 > so, if we were going to be completely accurate, we would use a titration
 > controlled by pH, with the endpoint at the lowest acceptable pH for
 > cleaning boards.....if I were using a Monoethanol Amine based system,
 > with a starting pH of 11.3, or so, I would use the system to a pH of 9.8
 > to 10.0.
 >
 > Rudy Sedlak
 > RD Chemical Company---------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315

-----------------------------------------------------