Re: [TN] Urethane Coating Spot Removal...
Hi All!

First I would like to thank everyone for all the dialog about ISO and Prototypes. There has been some extremely good discussion!

My next subject has been talked about recently, but I would like to get a little more detailed about some things.

We are about to embark on a task up-grading a bunch of assemblies (1200+) that have been coated with urethane conformal coating. The upgrades will consist of removing just a handfull of parts, and replacing them, maybe adding a jumper wire or two, and replacing part number labels with new rev ones. So we're going to spot remove and spot re-coat.

The -7721 lists a preferred removal method order table, and it lists Thermal as number 1, Grinding / Scraping number 2, Solvent number 3, and Micro Blasting number 3.

I've searched the achives and picked-up a bit of info, and there was a thread asking about what chemical to use removing urethanes from plastic SMT parts. I also did a search of the 'NET for some info, which prompts me to ask some questions.

Why would Micro-blasting be listed as one of the least desirable methods? I understand the ESD issue, but from what I learned in looking at two companies that I found that make this equipment (Crystal Mark and CCR Company), they address the ESD issues. Are their claims over stated? There's a *.PDFdocument that CCR has up on the web, that makes for some interesting reading. Go to:

http://www.ccrco.com/study.pdf

In that document, they state that using a thermal method is hazardous because the coating will produce toxic gases when burnt. I called Conathane and they said that if it is overheated, there is some cyanide given off. But I would think that only happens when you actually burn and char the coating, true? I've been playing around with a hot air pencil and a orange stick, and that works with no charring or burning, but that's dead slow.

I really don't want to use chemicals because it is so messy and takes forever, and we're only going to be doing a handful of places on each board.

So what method would you use if you had 1200 boards staring you in the face, with just a handfull of places on each board?

-Steve Gregory-

P.S. I'm looking into the possibilities of leasing a micro-blasting system, unless somebody says that's the worst thing I could do...
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------


    Hello friends, busy week so sorry for a late input.

I have only one piece of advice for Steve and others regarding repairs to Urethane based coatings – it is very difficult to return to a monolithic film as Urethane systems tend to laminate.

The repair coating will therefore need to be applied to a far wider area than that “spot” you fixed. It is possible that the ‘lamination” will be a path for ingrees of the stuff you are trying to keep out.

It is for this reason that Acrylics are more popular, because they will more readily return to monolithic film....and before anyone asks, no, you should not repair a urethane with an acrylic. The product has a coating that was carefully selected and qualified. Same generic type but different supplier MIGHT be OK, but you MUST check this with the originator.

Our route in this situation is to fully strip using a suitable solvent stripper bath – clean, repair, re-clean and then re-coat. It is easier and it looks better.

Hope this helps
--
Regards Graham Naisbitt

[log in to unmask]

Cell: 079 6858 2121
Office: +44 (0)1252 813706

Concoat Limited - Engineering Reliability in Electronics

Web: www.concoat.co.uk  and  www.concoatsystems.com
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------