Message
lets get into the root cause of the problem:
The short sight of corp. is the one to blame.  Compare to compensation measurement of high level management of America and Japan, the north American MFG is based on short term results (just look at Wall St. "meet expectation of Qx" press release and bonus of all the high level make).  Drive to short term profit at ANY cost=including farm out to off shore and risk the brand name are all fair game play (don't tell me these guy just so stupid without notice the cost/benefit analysis.  cost them nothing and personally benefit a lot).  However, the Japanese CEO reward is based on long term results, therefore, much less motivation to get into the same game.  The corp planning is more of long term (road map for corp Japan is in many times = some of them are 25-30 years, of the north American counter part (usually 3-5 years road map for corp if you lucky to get one).  Unless the overall corp structure is changed from short term to long term focus, the same trend will continue (sad to see the MFG loss the competitive edge slowly, but surely).
My 2 cents.  (Graham, you start this, don't blame me on the comment of this sensitive political issue).
                                         jk
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Graham Naisbitt
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 8:37 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Non Technical but VERY relevant

Hi  Rudy,

Interesting comments.

If you think about what has happened over the last decade or so, one can see that the PCB has been reduced to a commodity even though each one is custom. A "custom commodity" now there is an oxymoron for you...;-)

With most OEMs, it seems that buyers are rewarded (or at least historically have been) for getting the best price, not the best value.

Seems also that the OEMs have done much to create this mentality. As soon as they gave up manufacturing and turned to outside, they began to demand price cuts from folks who spent money on the R&D to develop technologies that they (the OEM) used to have to spend.

The producer/developer had obviously hoped to hold the line on price for a while with the product and thus recoup some of that development cost. If the producer balked, the OEM simply transferred the technological knowledge, (which they felt they owned), to the next lower tier on the food chain. Not having any R&D to recoup, the next guy in line would immediately make it for less. I have heard variations on this story several times from different folks over the last 6-7 years with household names in the role of the villain.

Seems like now that some of the seeds of ruin many OEMs have sowed are now taking root. If one does not treat their vendors ethically, why should they expect them to act ethically in return?  

I am not condoning the actions of the wayward vendors but it seems clear where they got at least some of their lessons in business ethics.

All the best in the new year.

Peace,
Joe
--------------------------------------------------- Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using


Perhaps I could add that famous remark attributed to General McArthur:

If my foresight was half as good as my hindsight, I’d be a damnsight!

--
Happy New Year!
 
Regards, Graham Naisbitt
[log in to unmask]
Mobile: +44 (0)79 6858 2121

Concoat Limited - Engineering Electronics Reliability

Web: www.concoat.co.uk   AND  www.concoatsystems.com

Sales:

Millfield House, Fleet Road
Fleet, Hampshire GU51 3QF UK
Phone: +44 (0)1252 813706
Fax: +44 (0)1252 813709

Manufacturing and Head Office:

Alasan House, Albany Park
Camberley, Surrey GU16 7PH UK
Phone: +44 (0)1276 691100
Fax: +44 (0)1276 691227
--------------------------------------------------- Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315 -----------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------- Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315 -----------------------------------------------------