Howard,

I think your real question is "What does this test have to do with the
life expectancy of the circuit?"
Answer: nothing!
It does provide a certain comfort level to the customer (justified or
not!).

What you want is the circuit to past the test. The fastest way would be
to put a 5 to 8 mil layer of silicone conformal coating over everything.

This would act as a thermal blanket and allow time for the solder joint
to relieve stress. It's not a CTE problem as much as the mismatch in the
Delta T between the polymers and the metal. Even if the CTEs matched
there would still be joint failures because of this difference.

This has very little to do with the expected life cycle (to many other
variables!).

BTW does this equipment experience sudden thermal shocks in the field?

I'm sure Werner will have more to say on this!


"Howard P. Stevens" wrote:

> A customer of Metallic Resources (manufacturers of bar solder)
> assembles circuit boards.Ý One of the many tests the boards go through
> is a thermal cycling test to see if thermal shock can cause failure in
> the circuit board.
>
> The customer's test specification is Spec Number TSC7514g, section
> 5.4, reference specification TSC 7010g.Ý (We do not know what this
> means.)Ý The customer cycles the circuit board from -30 degrees
> celcius to +80 degrees celcius.Ý The board temperature is dropped to
> -30 and held for thirty minutes.Ý The board temperature is then raised
> to +80 and held for thirty minutes, until the temperature is lowered
> again and so forth for a total of 3,500 hours.Ý The customer is now
> noticing solder joint failures on this double sided board on the top,
> which is both through-hole and SMT (failures of solder paste joints on
> the top), and on the bottom, which is just through-hole (failures of
> bar solder joints).Ý Solder joints, both top and bottom, show much
> cracking and some flux residue.
>
> The first question is: is this customer using their own test or is
> there an IPC test for thermal cycling of a completely assembled
> circuit board?
>
> The second question is: is the customer's temperature range too
> extreme, which is causing severe thermal shock, which is then causing
> joint failures due to different co-efficients of expansion and
> contraction  (board, solder, lead)?
>
> The third question is: is the use of 3,500 hours of thermal cycling
> realistic and/or too long?
>
> Any comments would be appreciated.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> METALLIC RESOURCES
>
> Howard P. Stevens
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV
> 1.8e
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
> in the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at:
> http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for
> additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
> 847-509-9700 ext.5315
> -----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------