I think Ken is talking about the Black Box.

"Sarrouf, Michael" wrote:

>
>
> Yes, I agree with the fact that the Aircraft Might have Hit the Ground
> with the force of 700G's, Killing everyone. My Point is that Mr. Patel
> worded his email " The Aircraft can take on 700G Force" To me this
> sounds like he is saying the aircraft is structurally sound to with
> stand a force of 700G's.
>
> My Perception only!!
>
>        -----Original Message-----
>
>      From:   Tim Weller [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
>      Sent:   Thursday, October 11, 2001 10:46 AM
>      To:     [log in to unmask]
>      Subject:        Re: [TN] Question for the physics "gurus"
>
>      It's not the in-flight stresses, it's the sudden impact with the
>      ground.
>
>      "Sarrouf, Michael" wrote:
>
>
>           Ken,
>
>           Coming from a Pilot's stand point. There is no way an
>           aircraft could pull 700g's. 7G's yes. People black out at
>           4.5-5g's if they are not wearing a Gsuit like the military
>           pilots wear. Military pilots can pull up to 9g's but they
>           are wearing the Gsuit. Most  commercial aircraft might have
>           the structural strength to with stand a 16G load Factor. At
>           700G's a person weighing 150lbs would weigh 35,000lbs.
>
>           Are you sure it was not 7G's the aircraft was pulling??
>
>           Mike
>
>                   -----Original Message-----
>           From:   Ken Patel [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
>           Sent:   Wednesday, October 10, 2001 6:29 PM
>           To:     [log in to unmask]
>           Subject:        Re: [TN] Question for the physics "gurus"
>
>                   All,
>           If G force is the gravitation force acting on the object
>           then why many times an object is
>           being designed to take so may G forces. What I have heard
>           that voice recorder of the plane
>           that went down in Pennsylvania can take on 700G force! So,
>           if the free fall is 1 G then why
>           design 700 times safer. So, height above the ground does
>           matter. May be I got to take a look
>           at the physic's book unless someone explain in layman's
>           term.
>
>                   re,
>           Ken Patel
>
>                   Timothy Reeves wrote:
>
>                   > No Jason,
>           > I am not a guru, but that's OK. They are not
>           interconvertible. One is a
>           > measure of force, the other acceleration (actually a
>           dimensionless
>           > multiplier of the standard gravitational acceleration, g,
>           9.8 m/s^2). If you
>           > have an object in mind of a known mass, you could find the
>           force exerted on
>           > it given the acceleration ("G's") by F = m a.
>           >
>           > Example: 100 gram object subjected to 5 G's ---------> F =
>           0.1 kg * 5 * 9.8
>           > m/s^2 = 4.9 Newtons or 0.5 kilogram force or 1.1 lb-force.
>
>           >
>           > Tim Reeves
>           >
>           > -----Original Message-----
>           > From: Jason Gregory [ <mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
>           > Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 9:01 AM
>           > Subject: Question for the physics "gurus"
>           >
>           > How do you convert pound/kilogram to G-force? Is this
>           convertable? Since
>           > G-force is somewhat time derived and pound/kilogram is
>           force derived?
>           > Any help is appreciated.
>           >
>           > Jason Gregory
>           > Software Specialist - NPI Group
>           > SCI Systems/Plant 2
>           > 13000 S. Memorial Pkwy.
>           > Huntsville, AL. 35803
>           > (256) 882-4107 x3728
>           > [log in to unmask]
>           >
>           >
>           ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>           > Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using
>           LISTSERV 1.8d
>           > To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with
>           following text in
>           > the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
>           > To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following
>           message: SET Technet NOMAIL
>           > Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line
>           Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
>           > Please visit IPC web site (
>           <http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm>) for additional
>           > information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]
>           or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
>           >
>           ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>           ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>           Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using
>           LISTSERV 1.8d
>           To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with
>           following text in
>           the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
>           To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following
>           message: SET Technet NOMAIL
>           Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources
>           & Databases > E-mail Archives
>           Please visit IPC web site (
>           <http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm>) for additional
>           information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
>           847-509-9700 ext.5315
>
>           --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>