Mike's just about closest ; and considering that address is "filtered" by ipc server ; there is a reason for it we don't know, and Hugo does ; otherwise the filter would not be in place (Monday piece of deductive logic), hey ? Lets see if Keach 's got an opinion about it. Can we get it off Keach, or do we have to live with this tao cyber ghost ? pk -----Original Message----- From: Stephen R. Gregory [mailto:[log in to unmask]] Sent: Sunday, 19 March 2000 5:49 To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: [TN] Strange email... In a message dated 03/18/2000 9:14:15 AM Central Standard Time, [log in to unmask] writes: << Steve Difficult to interpret, but somebody with the address gzgcec <[log in to unmask]> made a number of postings to TechNet last autumn [SNIP] Alternatively, I see your e-mail address is c/o AOL. These guys are notorious for losing and delaying messages. Only yesterday, I was correponding with another AOL member who complained that a message I sent him in January arrived only yesterday [SNIP] Brian >> Hi Brian! I'm not sure, but I don't think it's just a AOL thing, because Paul Klasek had been getting them too and asked me about it last week...see his message to me below. Are Paul and I the only ones getting this? Have any of you out there got any of those messages? This is getting weird... -Steve Gregory- From: Paul Klasek Sent: Wednesday, 15 March 2000 8:34 To: [log in to unmask] Subject: FW: Returned mail: Too many hops 115 (30 max): from <@public.guangzhou.gd.cn:[log in to unmask]> via pop.guangzhou.gd.cn, to <[log in to unmask]> This is the thing which gives me creeps , note the addresses, 'm not opening the attachments, help me to form some opinion about it . This one came this morning, coming daily. 1 Are you getting them too ? 2 If not, should we contact Jack or Hugo ? 3 This billion nice note came this morning too . thx paul -----Original Message----- From: Mail Delivery Subsystem [mailto:[log in to unmask]] Sent: Wednesday, 15 March 2000 7:50 To: [log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask] Subject: Returned mail: Too many hops 115 (30 max): from <@public.guangzhou.gd.cn:[log in to unmask]> via pop.guangzhou.gd.cn, to <[log in to unmask]> The original message was received at Tue, 14 Mar 2000 14:50:05 -0600 (CST) from pop.guangzhou.gd.cn [202.96.128.113] ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- <[log in to unmask]> ----- Transcript of session follows ----- 554 Too many hops 115 (30 max): from <@public.guangzhou.gd.cn:[log in to unmask]> via pop.guangzhou.gd.cn, to<[log in to unmask]> ############################################################## TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c ############################################################## To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body: To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name> To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF TECHNET ############################################################## Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional information. If you need assistance - contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315 ############################################################## ############################################################## TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c ############################################################## To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body: To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name> To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF TECHNET ############################################################## Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional information. If you need assistance - contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315 ##############################################################