TECHNET Archives

December 1999

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Alberto Callo <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 2 Dec 1999 11:01:49 -0800
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2381 bytes) , acallo.vcf (314 bytes)
Hi Richard,

I am interested in knowing about your experiment.  Could you please
describe the process, if possible.

Thanks

Alberto




"Hamilton, Richard CLE 4454" wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I too am interested in discussion on this matter. As an assembler using the
> boards we currently have our boards shipped to us in individual bags.
>
> The timing on this question is interesting. We are in the process of
> performing an experiment to determine the electrical effect of different
> conditions on boards that are shipped with and without: bags; peelable mask;
> contamination. The planned completion of the experiment is about 2 weeks
> away at this point. If there is interest, I will post basic test results
> here.
>
> In the meantime, I echo, anyone have any ideas or history?
>
> (Only 23 days to happy day, and 28 days to......well.....who knows what will
> happen!?)
>
> Richard Hamilton
> Clemar Mfg. / Rain Bird
> [log in to unmask]
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Anne Ledger [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 02, 1999 5:23 AM
> > To:   [log in to unmask]
> > Subject:      [TN] Bagging Requirements
> >
> > Good Morning Technet,
> >
> > I have a question for the board fabrication group.  We are tasked with
> > many different requests with regard
> > to "bagging" of boards for shipment.  Some customers require individual
> > bag and seal, some want anti-static bags, etc.,
> > the vast majority of customers do not call out any spec for bagging.  If
> > no spec is issued, is it fair to default to
> > the IPC-130?  Is 130 still viable?  Looking for some ideas of what the
> > rest of you are doing?
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Anne Ledger
> > EMDS, Inc.
> > [log in to unmask]
> >
>
> ##############################################################
> TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
> ##############################################################
> To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the body:
> To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
> To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
> ##############################################################
> Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
> information.
> If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
> 847-509-9700 ext.5365
> ##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2