TECHNET Archives

December 1999

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Douglas O. Pauls" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 17 Dec 1999 10:17:04 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
In a message dated 12/17/1999 9:04:36 AM US Eastern Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:

> In your work and in your life, try not to overanalyse things.

What?! And risk underanalyzing things?!  What test method would we use for
determining the degree of analyzation?  Does the IPC has specification or
standard on how much analyzing is analyzing enough, or how much analyzing is
appropriate for various situations?  Or is this one of those situations where
you negotiate the appropriate level of analyzation with your customer?

Jack Crawford, do we need to form a new task group on this effort?  How would
we complete the PIN for this?  Inquirin' minds want to know.

Man, I have had WAY too much Mountain Dew this morning.....................

Doug Pauls

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2