TECHNET Archives

December 1999

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: RO versus RE Classified Flux
From:
"Douglas O. Pauls" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 16 Dec 1999 07:48:42 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines) 
In a message dated 12/16/1999 7:46:35 AM US Eastern Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:

> If a water white rosin as received is purified or changed in any way is  the
>  flux produced from it considered type RE or type RO?
>

RO.  No matter how it is purified, it is still a rosin base (RO) rather than
a synthetic resin (RE) base.

Doug Pauls
CSL

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2