TECHNET Archives

December 1999

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Hiteshew, Michael" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Mon, 6 Dec 1999 12:06:08 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (131 lines)
Kelly
        We took your recommendation and looked at IPC-4101, table 5.
However, our interpretation is a little different from yours. We interpret
table 5 as a qualifying table. That is, in order to be qualified to
IPC-4101, a vendor must demonstrate they can produce material to all the
listed requirements. That's not saying that all material meets those
requirements by default.
        In addition, a look through the individual specification sheets will
show that fungus resistance does not appear (on any that I can find). This
reinforces our belief that fungus resistance is a special requirement that
must be specified in addition to the base material.
        I'd be interested in hearing from material and pwb manufacturers on
this.

-Mike

> ----------
> From:         Kelly M. Schriver[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent:         Monday, December 06, 1999 7:36 AM
> To:   TechNet E-Mail Forum.; Hiteshew, Michael
> Subject:      Re:      Re: [TN] Fungicidal Laminate
>
> Michael -
>
> I think what Doug is trying to point out is that the requirement for
> fungus
> resistance is already posted in the laminate material specification in
> most
> cases (ref. IPC-4101 table 5) as a part of the basic resin system
> qualification.  Accordingly, an additional requirement stipulated in the
> purchase order would not be required, and may only cloud the issue by
> imposition of additional specifications.
>
> Regards - Kelly
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hiteshew, Michael <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Friday, December 03, 1999 4:42 PM
> Subject: Re: [TN] Fungicidal Laminate
>
>
> Hi Doug,
>         We've been discussing this same issue here at Lockheed. According
> to
> IPC-6012 (Qualification and Performance Specification for Rigid Printed
> Boards) - Section 3.11 (p17), "Special Requirements", reads in part:
>         "When specified on the procurement documentation, some or all of
> the
> special requirements listed in the following paragraphs shall apply. ...".
> Section 3.11.3, which follows this statement, covers fungus resistance.
> Notice the key words "When specified..". This qualifying comment occurs
> again in Appendix A (p27). In addition, MIL-HDBK-454, Section 4.4, "Fungus
> Testing", reads in part:
>         "Group II materials should be subjected to the fungus test
> specified
> in MIL-STD-810...". Under Group II materials are epoxy glass-fiber
> laminates
> and epoxy resin. Also listed is polyurethane, the main component in Type
> UR
> conformal coating. Type AR (acrylic) is listed as a Group I (fungus inert)
> material.
>         So it sounds like these organic materials are fungus nutrients
> and,
> depending on your application environment, may need to treated with
> fungicide. Since this is a special requirement, it will need to specified
> on
> the procurement documentation.
>
> Michael Hiteshew
> Lockheed Martin Launching Systems
> [log in to unmask]
> (410) 682-1259
>
>
> > ----------
> > From:         Douglas O. Pauls[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> > Reply To:     TechNet E-Mail Forum.;[log in to unmask]
> > Sent:         Friday, December 03, 1999 7:34 AM
> > To:   [log in to unmask]
> > Subject:      Re: [TN] Fungicidal Laminate
> >
> > In a message dated 12/02/1999 2:54:44 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
> > [log in to unmask] writes:
> >
> > >
> > >  It seems to be my week for strange requests.
> > >  Does anyone know of a fungicidally treated FR4 laminate? Or of any
> > >  fungicidal treatment which can be applied to an assembled circuit
> > board.
> > >
> >
> > I can't really see the need for a fungicide.  Most IPC specs have the
> > requirement that the base material, such as laminate, mask, and coating
> be
> > non-nutrient in nature, which means it would not support growth of a
> > fungus.
> >
> > Doug Pauls - CSL
>
> ##############################################################
> TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
> ##############################################################
> To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with
> following
> text in
> the body:
> To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
> To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
> ##############################################################
> Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for
> additional
> information.
> If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
> 847-509-9700 ext.5365
> ##############################################################
>

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2