Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 3 Dec 1999 09:15:46 -0800 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
<E9B28CE8CFCDD21186B800A0C9DED6DAA7BEA5@TAZ> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Jim,
One of our customer use 10 microgram/in2 as a pass or fail criteria for bare
boards, using the modified rose test.
[log in to unmask]
-----Original Message-----
From: DesignerCouncil [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of
Walton, Jim
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 1999 12:37 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [DC] IPC Ionic test
Hey everyone,
Has anyone come to a conclusion when using IPC-tm-650 number 2.3.39? Item
6.8 clearly avoids any usable answer. I am looking for max. acceptable
levels of contaminants for bare boards (incoming from the fab house) and
assembled boards (before they are shipped from our dock). How about a
listing of severity of certain contaminants as they pertain to dendrite
growth on pcbs? I have test results, but I'm not a chemist so I am having a
hard time coming up with definitive answers to what is "bad" and what can
pass.
I know there must be "real world" experienced people out there that can
help.
TIA
Jim Walton
|
|
|