TECHNET Archives

November 1999

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"James H. Moffitt" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Sun, 28 Nov 1999 15:31:35 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
Roger:
-Your problem is not all that uncommon.  Many folks try to use the
requirements of IPC-A-610, J-STD-001, or some other comparable standard to
judge the quality of repaired products.  Education of the QA Manager (and
subsequently the Inspection force) is the only answer to the problem.  Each
category of corrective action (rework, repair, refurbishment, overhaul or
restoration) has an accept/reject criteria that is unique to the corrective
action category.  Rework is the ONLY corrective action category that results
in a product that will fully meet the original design and drawing
requirements.  Unless you can get the attention of the QA manager and discuss
with them the realistic limits of a repair action (it don't have to be
"pretty", it just has to work) life will continue to be difficult.
- Jim Moffitt, Tech. Dir. Electronics Training Advantage

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2