TECHNET Archives

November 1999

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Phil Crepeau <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Mon, 8 Nov 1999 10:27:16 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (77 lines)
hi,

i would suggest that you find out the manufacturer of that maskant and find
out from them what other, safer solvent(s) would do this job.  if they don't
have a safer solvent system, then they should ask the president of that
company to come out and clean the equipment for them.  i can't imagine
anything much worse that what they are now using from both a health and fire
hazard point of view.  how can that company get away with exposing their
employees to those conditions?

phil crepeau

-----Original Message-----
From: Denis Bégin [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 1999 8:38 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] LPISM Cleaning


The workers at a printed wiring board manufacturer use a mixture of
volatile solvents (e.g. MEK, toluene) to clean liquid photoimageable solder
masks (LPISM) inside the machines (Ichinose SMT-200 from Toshin Kogyo Co.,
and DP-2000 from Circuit Automation inc.)  used to apply the masks on the
boards and to clean off the masks on the screens and other instruments when
they must change the mask.  The masks are not cured when this task is
performed.  Workers perform this task manually using solvent soaked rags.
The workers' breathing air concentration of MEK and toluene is very high
while doing this task.  I was wondering if any of you know of a safer
solvent that I might recommend to this company.  Alternatively, is there
another way of applying the masks that would eliminate the use of cleaning
solvents?  To date, I have had suggestions from two LPISM manufacturers.
One of the suggested solvent mixture is even more toxic than the one
presently used!  The other suggestion I got is a safer solvent but from the
nature of the solvents (dibasic esters and glycol ethers) I suspect that it
will not evaporate fast enough...

Denis Begin, M.Sc.
Research Assistant
University of Montreal
Faculty of Medicine
Department of Occupational and Environmental Health
PO Box 6128, Main Station
Montreal (Quebec) H3C 3J7
Canada
Tel: 514-343-2170
Fax: 514-343-2200
[log in to unmask]

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following
text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2