DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

November 1999

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
DesignerCouncil <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
IPUG <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 9 Nov 1999 08:56:10 -0800
Reply-To:
"DesignerCouncil E-Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]>, Ray Humphrey <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Subject:
FR-4 Vs. CEM-3
From:
Ray Humphrey <[log in to unmask]>
X-cc:
"Al Otis Jr." <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Organization:
DynaCad Design Services
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines) 
Does anyone on the forum have any experience using CEM-3 PCB material?  How
would you compare it to FR-4?  Would you use it for dimensional critical
designs?

Thanks, for any feedback you may have.

hammering away....
Ray Humphrey, DynaCad Design Services
[log in to unmask]    ||  http://www.dynacad.com/
[log in to unmask]  ||  http://Ray.Humphrey.net/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2