Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 18 Nov 1999 09:14:10 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
Organization: |
Lucent Technologies |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I typically handle vias as inner layer traces, Then derated them anywhere up
to 50% depending on the requirements for the design. (steady state current
vs max current, duration of max current, etc.)
I haven't had any vias burn up during testing for Military use (brutal).
Regards;
Tom G.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
>
> At 02:49 PM 11/17/99 -0800, Rodney Carrico wrote:
>
> >To the best of our knowledge....
> >The current carrying capacity of a blind micro-via is calculated just as you
> >would for any other via or flat conductor - by finding the minimum square
> >area of the conductor's cross-section, then using the IPC-2221 "Conductor
> >Thickness and Width" charts.
>
> This may be good as an approximation, but the heat dissipation will vary
> for a trace depending on whether it is a surface trace or a buried one. I'd
> think a via might be somewhere in between, and a blind via would be even
> more like a buried trace. Fortunately, vias are typically fairly short.
>
--
Tom Garman KC4WAR Telephone 614 860 6064
Lucent Technologies, Inc. Facsimile 614 868 4019
Room 4O05-1P Email [log in to unmask]
6200 E. Broad St. Columbus, Ohio 43213-1569
|
|
|