TECHNET Archives

October 1999

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Wanner Bernhard <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 5 Oct 1999 09:48:04 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
Hi Joan
... The solder resist is a other possible cause. Do you have control about
the used solder resist, do specify the type (Peters SD 2463), or at least
the class (IPC-SM-840C, class T)? It seems some types of solder resist are
secreting substances which prevents good solderability (and/or good bond of
a conformal coating). Some solder resist could be ok as type itself, but
mis-processed by pcb-shop (for example to less UV-curing for photosensitive
solder resists, has also catastrophal consequences for the Comparative
Tracking Index, CTI).
You see, there is a alchemistic kitchenette it would be fascinating to
analize the development of failure theses in a jungian manner and so, at
least I have to agree to Earl's mail: "... but what's changed? ..."
Regards

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2