TECHNET Archives

October 1999

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 15 Oct 1999 10:41:44 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (73 lines)
Richard,

What you are saying is true, but the moisture that is quickly absorbed back into the
board is initially near the surface of the board, and not likely to create
delamination.  It is the moisture which is deep in the board that can become trapped
and build up the required pressure to cause a delam.  This is also true to some degree
for components.  Your concerns about baking are also true.  You can bake a board or
component and cause/increase a solder joint problem.

Conformal coat:  Most conformal coats do not form a barrier to water vapor.  They do
not "seal" the moisture in or out.

How much advantage there is in baking parts is probably related to the Relative
Humidity of the enviroment the parts are stored in, and come into equilibrium with.  I
would expect differing results between southern California and Florida.

George Franck
" my Opinions are Just that."

Richard Tilbrook wrote:

> Steve,
> If you vacuum oven your boards (boiling off and evacuating any moisture),
> then open them into an environment, perhaps 22deg.C and 60%RH, won't the
> boards quickly absorb the moisture in that environment? If you then
> manufacture the boards, then ATE and inspect them, then conformal coat /
> dip them, you'll be sealing moisture in.
>
> I only ask because I am researching into moisture sensitive components,
> and one of the options is to put the components into a vacuum (oven /
> chamber).
>
> I am concerned that putting non-hermetically sealed electronics
> components (boards or devices) into a vacuum oven leads to little or no
> advantage, and only the acceleration of intermetallic formations between
> copper and tinned layer as a result.
>
> My question (finally) is would this be the case? Or would the rate of
> absorption be so slow that it wouldn't really matter?
>
> Regards,
>
> Richard Tilbrook
>
> ##############################################################
> TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
> ##############################################################
> To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the body:
> To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
> To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
> ##############################################################
> Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
> information.
> If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
> 847-509-9700 ext.5365
> ##############################################################
>

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2