Jim,
we have taken a survey among our suppliers and these are the results, which are
based on a 4 layer board.
They are not accurate because they differ about 10% from one manufacturer to the
other, but they can serve as a clue.
*2 layer 50%
*4 layer 100%
*4 layer (2 + 2 HDI) 120%
*6 layer 130%
*6 layer (4 + 2 HDI) 150%
*8 layer 160%
*6 layer (4 + 2 HDI + buried vias) 170%
*8 layer (6 + 2 HDI) 180%
*8 layer (6 + 2 HDI + buried vias) 200%
As for your second question, I would use the Sig1, GND,VCC,Sig2 stackup. The
alternative requires HDI technology (vias in pad) and the planes are more
fractured.This may lead to possible radiation from the return currents which are
forced to flow around the openings in the plane. With the first stackup you can
still fill unused areas on both surfaces of the board with GND, if you connect
them with numerous vias to the inner layer plane.
Volkmar
Jim Mathis wrote:
> Assuming all other considerations being equal (size, # of holes, hole sizes,
> etc.), what is the typical cost adder for going 4-layer from 2-layer? 1.5X,
> 2X. etc?
>
> Also, in an EMI-sensitive environment, how would you recommend the layer
> stack-up? Signal 1, Ground, Supply, Signal 2 OR Ground, S1, S2, Supply? OR
> something else?
>
> Thanks.
--
Volkmar Huß Dräger ProTech GmbH
Engineering Electronic Circuit Boards Elektronikbaugruppen
Phone +49 451 882-3998 Moislinger Allee 53/55
FAX -4365
23542 Lübeck / Germany
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|