DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

October 1999

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Dallara, Louis T (Louis)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
DesignerCouncil E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Wed, 20 Oct 1999 12:25:42 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
     Left to right and then top to bottom..
     Lou

> ----------
> From:         Hope Lariosa[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Reply To:     DesignerCouncil E-Mail Forum.;Hope Lariosa
> Sent:         Wednesday, October 20, 1999 12:09 PM
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> Subject:      [DC] component numbering
>
> Is there a 'standard' on how to number components?
>
> I'm referring to the way reference designators for components are placed.
> If people (engineer, designer, assembler, technician) want to see a Right,
> Down method, would that apply to the schematic or the board?  If there is
> no stanrdard, I'm sure it all boils down to whatever the people involved
> agree upon.
>
> I was wondering what the popular concensus is...anyone?
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2