Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | TechNet E-Mail Forum. |
Date: | Fri, 15 Oct 1999 12:24:01 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Until a couple of years ago, on .5mm pitch, the smallest solder mask
web allowed was always spec'd at .005", since any narrower then that
and flaking was almost guaranteed. I have just addressed this issue
with two of our board vendors, who were resistant, since I wanted wide
pads AND solder mask on our .5mm pitch parts....but they were able to
obtain compliance when I relaxed my spec to..."....minimum solder mask
web of .004" with adhesion of web (i.e., no flaking). Also, solder
mask can be allowed to go up to the pad, but NOT encroach onto the
pad".
Most suppliers can hold this process, and the "newer" solder masks are
capable of good adhesion if processed properly.
Hope this helps
Jeff Hempton, Sr. SMD Mfg. Engineer
United Technology Electronic Controls
e-mail: [log in to unmask]
______________________________ Forward Header __________________________________
Subject: Re: [TN] Fab: Mask dams between fine pitch smt pads
Author: Mike Bailey <[log in to unmask]> at Internet
Date: 10/13/1999 6:41 AM
.0035 - .004 is within the capabilities of most shops, even on .5mm pitch
devices. Occasionally, this is an issue when small via holes in high aspect
ratio boards must remain open after developing. It requires a slightly
overdeveloped condition to clear all mask residue from the holes. Otherwise
it is consistently achievable.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Cosper [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 1999 5:16 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Fab: Mask dams between fine pitch smt pads
Hi all,
Just a quick industry capability questions. Are board manufactures still
having trouble holding mask dams between fine pitch (19mil) SMT pads. As
recent as a year or so ago I was under the impression that board shops would
ask the remove these small dams when they got them on the Gerber data. Is
this still common. I am interested in what most people think is feasible
regarding mask dams that are 4 mils wide and smaller. All responses are
appreciated.
Ed Cosper
ABC
##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the body:
To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################
##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################
|
|
|