I like to have the original message included so that I can see what the original question is. It also helps me follow the thread of conversation, very often there is more than one separate reply to a single question (instead of a reply to a reply to a reply....to a question.) As a relatively inexperienced (but learning fast) manufacturing engineer, it helps me to see the question AND answer.
In deference to our beleaguered colleagues, however, I'll make it a point to delete the junk that accumulates at the bottom of the message.
Eric Kalgren
BFGoodrich Aerospace
Data Systems Division
>>> "McMonagle, Michael R." <[log in to unmask]> 09/28/99 08:50AM >>>
I agree with Ted. The attached message or threads can be helpful in
refreshing the original question, and don't impact message size that much.
To each their own, but I like 'em left alone....
Mike McMonagle
PCA Process Engineering Supervisor
K*Tec Electronics
1111 Gillingham Lane
Sugar Land, TX 77478
(281) 243-5639 Phone
(281) 243-5539 Fax
[log in to unmask]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Edwards, Ted A (AZ75) [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 1999 9:37 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [TN] Including original message in responses - NOT
>
> I am not sure I agree with this approach, I get the individual messages
> and
> if a reply does not reference anything it is sometimes very hard to
> determine which question message it is associated with. Most messages not
> associate with the original question have little value in my opinion, and
> if
> the answer is several weeks old as sometimes happens when you can not
> access
> the TechNet while on the road, the ability to associate with the original
> message is truly lost if it is not an attachment. When I save them and
> recall them months later to answer a question it would be impossible to
> associate it with the original without it attached.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mark Mazzoli [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 1999 7:03 AM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: [TN] Including original message in responses - NOT
> >
> > Sorry John. I wasn't aware.
> >
> > Mark Mazzoli
> > [log in to unmask]
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: John C. Schultz <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 1999 9:12 AM
> > Subject: [TN] Including original message in responses - NOT
> >
> >
> > > Would people please NOT include the original message in their
> response.
> > > After all we have already seen the original posting - right?
> > >
> > > I get digest format and seemingly at least half of the lines in any
> > > particular digest are the original message. Sometimes repeated
> several
> > > times.
> > >
> > > This makes it extremely difficult for me to scan through the messages
> > for
> > > interesting information since I have to scan threaded responses and
> > > irrelevant header information.
##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################
|
