In my personal opinion cutting of the posting that is being responsed ( I do
have some problems with english) ,will lead our discussions very quickly to
no-where.
I do agree with Tod`s and Mike`s opinions,maybe we should cut non-relevant
parts of the original postings,such as bottom lines of the IPC forum etc.
Edward Szpruch
Eltek , Manager of Process Engineering
P.O.Box 159 ; 49101 Petah Tikva Israel
Tel ++972 3 9395050 , Fax ++972 3 9309581
e-mail [log in to unmask]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: McMonagle, Michael R. [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: ג ספטמבר 28 1999 16:50
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [TN] Including original message in responses - NOT
>
> I agree with Ted. The attached message or threads can be helpful in
> refreshing the original question, and don't impact message size that much.
> To each their own, but I like 'em left alone....
>
> Mike McMonagle
> PCA Process Engineering Supervisor
> K*Tec Electronics
> 1111 Gillingham Lane
> Sugar Land, TX 77478
> (281) 243-5639 Phone
> (281) 243-5539 Fax
> [log in to unmask]
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Edwards, Ted A (AZ75) [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 1999 9:37 AM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: [TN] Including original message in responses - NOT
> >
> > I am not sure I agree with this approach, I get the individual messages
> > and
> > if a reply does not reference anything it is sometimes very hard to
> > determine which question message it is associated with. Most messages
> not
> > associate with the original question have little value in my opinion,
> and
> > if
> > the answer is several weeks old as sometimes happens when you can not
> > access
> > the TechNet while on the road, the ability to associate with the
> original
> > message is truly lost if it is not an attachment. When I save them and
> > recall them months later to answer a question it would be impossible to
> > associate it with the original without it attached.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Mark Mazzoli [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 1999 7:03 AM
> > > To: [log in to unmask]
> > > Subject: Re: [TN] Including original message in responses - NOT
> > >
> > > Sorry John. I wasn't aware.
> > >
> > > Mark Mazzoli
> > > [log in to unmask]
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: John C. Schultz <[log in to unmask]>
> > > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 1999 9:12 AM
> > > Subject: [TN] Including original message in responses - NOT
> > >
> > >
> > > > Would people please NOT include the original message in their
> > response.
> > > > After all we have already seen the original posting - right?
> > > >
> > > > I get digest format and seemingly at least half of the lines in any
> > > > particular digest are the original message. Sometimes repeated
> > several
> > > > times.
> > > >
> > > > This makes it extremely difficult for me to scan through the
> messages
> > > for
> > > > interesting information since I have to scan threaded responses and
> > > > irrelevant header information.
> > > >
>
##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################
|
