just a guess, some products (vibration requirements) are required that all
the connectors being soldered on. second guess, someone brought the wrong
finish of the connector (or wrong type). third guess, someone did a
prototype using press fit ...subsequent development forgot to change it to
"solder on" on the product level...(my guess just my guess...If any of the
other parties have similar experiences, it is turely by coincidence...)
jk
At 04:39 PM 9/21/99 -0700, you wrote:
>hi,
>
>on the surface it surely seems unnecessary to wave solder this connector.
>however, you might want to see if there might be a good reason for it. for
>example, your customer might have learned that his press fit connector was
>extremely unreliable. his (or her) approach to fixing this may have been to
>require that the pins be soldered. this scenario isn't likely, but who
>knows?
>
>phil
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Stephen R. Gregory [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 1999 2:40 PM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: [TN] Okay, try not to laugh...
>
>
>Hi Techies!
>
>This one you'll get a kick out of. I've been working quite a bit in wave
>solder here recently, and today an assembly that has been built once here
>before (prior to me starting here) came down to my area to be waved
>soldered.
>
>It had suprised me to see the boards at wave solder because earlier I had
>noticed that there was two right angle connectors being pressed into the
>board. I asked why were they bringing me the boards and I was told; "To wave
>the connectors..." (they were the only through-hole on the board BTW) "But
>why?" I asked, "They're press-fit connectors!" The reply was; "Well, that's
>the way we did them last time..." I tried not to laugh...honestly I
>did...kept a pretty straight face actually.
>
>So when ya'll get through laughing, tell me this, what kind of problems can
>occur from trying to wave solder press-fit connectors...besides the obvious
>barrel fill issues that come from the design of compliant-pin press fit
>connectors keeping the solder from flowing up the barrel..."No wonder we had
>some many solder problems last time.." I was told by a few of rework
>operators here...kept a straight face on that comment too. (These are
>Harting
>press-fits by the way, a kind of triangular spade looking pin that almost
>fills the whole barrel).
>
>Me in my logic, thinks that since the connectors were pressed in, there's
>got
>to be some slight barrel deformation and/or strain put on the barrel walls.
>Then running it across a 500-degree pot of molten solder just adds to the
>strain from the thermal expansion it's going to see and could create some
>problems.
>
>Now I might entertain wave soldering a press-fit if I got a board in that
>had
>holes way out of spec and the connectors could be almost pushed in with your
>hands. But these connectors have good contact throughout the barrel, and the
>pins have been deformed (complied) with the barrel as they were pressed-in.
>
>There's a rumor a-foot that some think we should wave them anyway so they
>look like the ones we built before. I think that's almost the stupidest
>reason I've ever heard to do something like that. I wanna know if there's
>anything detrimental to waving these boards with a nice tight press-fit
>already done...I think there is. What do ya'll think?
>
>-Steve "I'm about to pull my hair out!" Gregory-
>
>##############################################################
>TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
>##############################################################
>To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following
>text in
>the body:
>To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
>To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF TECHNET
>##############################################################
>Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
>information.
>If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
>847-509-9700 ext.5365
>##############################################################
>
>##############################################################
>TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
>##############################################################
>To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following
text in
>the body:
>To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
>To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF TECHNET
>##############################################################
>Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
>information.
>If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
>847-509-9700 ext.5365
>##############################################################
>
##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################
|
