TECHNET Archives

September 1999

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Richard Desrosiers <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Wed, 15 Sep 1999 08:26:32 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (154 lines)
Earl - There are some applications where DF Mask is the only solution.  Like
most systems in this business, they can never completely go away.  We
maintain a DF capability to serve our customers needs.

Keep Smiling

Dick Desrosiers
Director of Manufacturing
Harbor Electronics
3021 Kenneth St
Santa Clara, CA  95054
408-988-6544
408-406-3729  (cell)
[log in to unmask]


        -----Original Message-----
        From:   pod [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
        Sent:   Wednesday, September 15, 1999 3:54 AM
        To:     [log in to unmask]
        Subject:        Re: [TN] Dry Film Mask Issues...

        Good ranting. Now get rid of the DF for ever and find another way to
deal
        with vias.

        Earl Moon
        ----- Original Message -----
        From: Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>
        To: <[log in to unmask]>
        Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 1999 5:20 PM
        Subject: [TN] Dry Film Mask Issues...


        > Hey Ya'll,
        >
        > Well, judging from the responses I've read on a number of issues
about dry
        > film mask issues, it almost seems that there are more and more
boards
        being
        > specified with dry film mask on them.
        >
        > This seems to be driven by how well dry film tents vias. I
recieved many
        > responses about via fill, and most of them said that it was better
to have
        no
        > via fill at all, or if you did, it had better be at least
75%...something
        > that cannot be guaranteed with LPI masks.
        >
        > We all know that LPI mask won't tent vias, but then sometimes
because of
        the
        > mask characteristics, a via may just try to fill during wave and
fill less
        > than 75%. This is the reason (I feel) that hi-rel companies still
continue
        to
        > specify dry film. They'd rather make sure that none of the vias
fill, and
        not
        > even worry about what a pain in the butt it is to try and place
and solder
        a
        > 300-pin plus QFP without solder bridges with a "windowed" dry
film.
        >
        > Dry film mask is usually at least 1-2 mils higher than the pad
surface, so
        > when I print, I'm getting a extra mil or two over and above the
stencil
        > thickness because the dry film is holding my stencil up that high
above
        the
        > pads. From now on, when I'm going to specify a stencil thickness
for
        20-mil
        > pitch with dry film masks, I'm going to ask for a 4-mil stencil
from now
        on,
        > and have my stencil vendor "mickey-mouse" or "dogbone" my 50-mil
apertures
        to
        > give me the additional volume I need for my J-leaded devices and
whatnot.
        >
        > The stencil I've been using with the most recent assembly has been
6-mil
        with
        > a industry standard aperture reduction and I've been getting mucho
bridges
        > (with this stupid dry film).
        >
        > In the past, 6-mil stencil thickness with LPI masks have NEVER
been a
        problem
        > with bridging from my experience...
        >
        > Just ranting is all...
        >
        > -Steve Gregory-
        >
        > ##############################################################
        > TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV
1.8c
        > ##############################################################
        > To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with
        following text in
        > the body:
        > To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
        > To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
        > ##############################################################
        > Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for
        additional
        > information.
        > If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at
[log in to unmask] or
        > 847-509-9700 ext.5365
        > ##############################################################

        ##############################################################
        TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV
1.8c
        ##############################################################
        To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with
following text in
        the body:
        To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
        To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
        ##############################################################
        Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for
additional
        information.
        If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at
[log in to unmask] or
        847-509-9700 ext.5365
        ##############################################################

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2