DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

September 1999

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
DesignerCouncil E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 14 Sep 1999 13:09:39 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
At 11:37 AM 9/14/99 -0700, Jim Dobbins wrote:
>We have inherited an smd parts library where the pad shapes
>are all rectangles. Our past practice has been to use pads
>with rounded corners. The sm782 land pattern calculator at
>http://search.ipc.org/SM782/default.asp
>has notations that state 'full radius preferred' for smd
>part pads.
>
>Is there is significant difference/risk in choosing rectangular
>pads over those with rounded corners?

My old version of SM782 has nothing but rectangular pads; they seem to be
far more common than rounded corner pads, so they can't be *too* bad.
Theoretically, a square pad might have a greater tendency to peel off of
the board, but that is probably not significant, and there might be effects
at high voltages or frequencies, also not usually much of an issue. There
are two other differences that I can think of:

Rounded corners can give some extra routing space.
Rounded corner pads are not a standard Gerber flash shape, so they can lead
to some confusion in plotting. The corner radius should be specified if
rounded corner pads are to be used.

[log in to unmask]
Abdulrahman Lomax
P.O. Box 690
El Verano, CA 95433

ATOM RSS1 RSS2