DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

September 1999

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
DesignerCouncil E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Mon, 27 Sep 1999 11:39:42 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
Your RF guy might be correct.
For RF applications using Epoxy blended materials I usually specify the
laminate.  Two that come to mind are Getek, and Nelco 4000-13.  There are many
others which are blended for high-speed, low-loss operations.  There actually is
a wide range of materials which can qualify as FR-4, with a wide range of
electrical properties at 'higher' frequencies.

Even with the same resin, the dielectric constant for them material on 7628
glass might be 4.6, and on 106 glass might 4.1.  Why?  because the resin %
changes from 40% to 75% and the glass has a dielectric constant of over 6, and
the resin has a constant of around 3.



George Franck
"My Opinions are just that"


Ron Luman wrote:

> I am having a problem with the RF engineer saying the board material
> (vendor) is the problem with his circuit not working. In every formula I
> have looked at the dielectric constant of FR4 is the same.
> My boards are .062 thick FR4 Tg 130. no soldermask no silkscreen.
> Can someone out there explain to me what the differences can be between two
> vendors when they are both using the same process notes I supply to make the
> boards??
> And how this might effect the RF circuit?
> Thank You
>
> Ronny Luman C.I.D.
> SERCEL INC.
> (918) 621-5725
> [log in to unmask]
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2