DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

September 1999

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Chris Elliott <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
DesignerCouncil E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 23 Sep 1999 21:23:39 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Hello Karl Bates

On 22-Sep-99, Karl Bates wrote:
KB> Mark,
KB>    Yes you are correct.
KB> supported hole = plated
KB> unsupported hole = non-plated

KB> Too many terms not enough definition (or time).

Actually, I think the reason for the 'extra' terms (supported &
unsupported) is because there are several ways to electrically connect
the pad on a through-hole.  Not only is there plating, but remember
they used to rivet some holes.  (May still do this for some processes,
but I don't know what design considerations would require a rivet.
Mebby current capacity or mechanical strength?)  So the terms
supported & unsupported are actually generic terms that refer to the
specific terms plated, riveted, etc... & non-plated, non-rivited,
non-etc... respectively.

Now, I may be way off base here, but it seems to make sence.

Pax
--
     Member: Team AMIGA                       --} WatchDog
Fingerprint: 2C 8A 03 3C D6 D3 32 7F         (Chris Elliott)
             66 0F 9B 9F 03 77 1D 85      PGP Key ID: A6A79259
<tsb>"And now the penguin on top of your television set will explode."

ATOM RSS1 RSS2