DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

September 1999

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: MIL-STD-100
From:
Chris Robertson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
DesignerCouncil E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 17 Sep 1999 14:06:17 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (511 bytes) 
Kelly,
If you find out other than by this forum, please post your findings.
Thanks,
Chris Robertson
PCB Designer
Lockheed - Martin Services, Inc.
[log in to unmask]
Ph/Fax (256) 722-2626
ICQ# 13541566

Hi All

Does anyone have current visibility into the Defense Standards Improvement
Council's current position regarding MIL-STD-100 (Engineering Drawings) vs.
ANSI/ASME Y14.100M (1/6/98) on the same subject?  The foreword in the ASME
document suggests that the designer may be faced with a mixed bag.

Regards - Kelly

ATOM RSS1 RSS2