TECHNET Archives

August 1999

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Paul Klasek <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 3 Aug 1999 15:13:48 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (83 lines)
David I would not necessarily agree about the severity comparison :
Seen joints to live through shock test and die on parallel cycling .
The joint mass ; and ghost of applications specifics can be designed to
perform to both terms .
Both are different, in each term , with in-between "interpolations" quite
often misleading without knowing the specific design
(components/pads/solders/etc.) interplays .

I think in IPC-SM-785 Werner wrote anything slower than 30'C/m ramp is cycle
;
faster is shock .

It always very much depends on the actual life of the task character .
To give you extreme example :
Implanted pacemaker needed only some 50 cycles for validations ; no need for
shock tests .
as it spends most of it's life in constant 37'C (forget the surgeon's
storage in Alaska);
The same board working in field would need 5000 cycles just to get on
shortlist .
The same in space 10 to 100 times more again .

Very simplified ; the shock is looking at strength ;
the cycle at endurance .
Solder, being relatively strong joint type to start with gives sufficient
initial strength base,
making thus the endurance part of reliability much more in effort focus .

That goes to such peculiarities as experienced on some railway cards ,
when certain componentry resonating to certain frequencies had to be
soldered to different designs because of very specific conditions .
First is the task ; THAN you look for the standards and tests (or make your
own) .

See you

Paul Klasek
http://www.resmed.com



-----Original Message-----
From: David yeh [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, 3 August 1999 0:25
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Reliability test


Could anyone enlighten me on the difference between Thermal shock and
Temperature cycling test. I know the former is more severe but what is each
test looking at?

Thanks.

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following
text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2