TECHNET Archives

August 1999

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"McGlaughlin, Jeffrey A" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 27 Aug 1999 07:49:12 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (83 lines)
Ken -

RF can be a real nightmare to work on.  I have seen/designed PCBs that were
"tune-able" by adding a blob of solder in the "right" place, or by angling a
component across the pads instead of mounting it square. I once saw a tech
turn a non-polarized cap end-for-end to get the circuit to work in spec. The
real problem is not the tolerance of the board or the tolerance of the
component but the net tolerance of the system (if you have a few spare
months(?) maybe you could work this out). What I am saying is that a tighter
tolerance may reduce the number of components that function marginally but
it probably will not eliminate the problem all together. And just think this
will only get worse as frequencies go up and size goes down.

An eternal optimist,
Jeffrey A. McGlaughlin
PCB Designer
Battelle Memorial Institute
Columbus Ohio
[log in to unmask]


        -----Original Message-----
        From:   Ken Patel [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
        Sent:   Thursday, 26 August, 1999 17:51
        To:     [log in to unmask]
        Subject:        [TN] Any connection: Impedance Control value & RF
Board

        Experts,
        We have couple of RF boards which are relatively new to us. Many
times, we
        have to replace passive components to make it work. Hence, I have
this
        hypothetical question for you. Is it due to not having correct
impedance
        value even though measured value on coupon falls within 50+/-10
ohms%? Do
        you think we may to have tighten our current impedance specification
        (50+/-10 ohms%) if there is a relationship?

        Being a mechanical kind of guy this question may sound stupid! Hope
to hear
        from many of you.

        re,
        ken patel
        ______________________________________________________
        Ken Patel                       Phone:  (408) 490-6804
        1708 McCarthy Blvd.             Fax:    (408) 490-6859
        Milpitas, CA 95035              Beeper: (888) 769-1808

        ##############################################################
        TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV
1.8c
        ##############################################################
        To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with
following text in
        the body:
        To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
        To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
        ##############################################################
        Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for
additional
        information.
        If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at
[log in to unmask] or
        847-509-9700 ext.5365
        ##############################################################

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2