TECHNET Archives

August 1999

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Andrew Kowalewski <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 26 Aug 1999 17:06:38 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (76 lines)
Hi Ken,

Sounds to me like the design is marginal and has not taken tolerances into
account. These tolerances can be either component tolerances or board dielectric
constant / manufacturing (trace topology) tolerances.

Do you have the same problem with the same batch of boards? With the same batch
of components? Across different batches of each? These factors give you a clue
about where the marginal design exists.

Normal impedance tolerance on a manufactured board would be +/- 5 percent - a
ten percent tolerance might be enough to stop something working but I would put
that in the "marginal design" bracket.

Do you have access to the design engineers? They would have lived with something
like this in their development and are probably very familiar with your problem.
However, getting them to admit that might be problematical  :-)

Cheers

    Andy Kowalewski
    NEC Amrica, Inc.


____________________Reply Separator____________________
Subject:    [TN] Any connection: Impedance Control value & RF Board
Author: Ken Patel <[log in to unmask]>
Date:       8/26/99 2:50 PM

Experts,
We have couple of RF boards which are relatively new to us. Many times, we
have to replace passive components to make it work. Hence, I have this
hypothetical question for you. Is it due to not having correct impedance
value even though measured value on coupon falls within 50+/-10 ohms%? Do
you think we may to have tighten our current impedance specification
(50+/-10 ohms%) if there is a relationship?

Being a mechanical kind of guy this question may sound stupid! Hope to hear
from many of you.

re,
ken patel
______________________________________________________
Ken Patel                       Phone:  (408) 490-6804
1708 McCarthy Blvd.             Fax:    (408) 490-6859
Milpitas, CA 95035              Beeper: (888) 769-1808

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2