TECHNET Archives

August 1999

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Paul Klasek <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 26 Aug 1999 11:01:27 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (79 lines)
Anybody home (?IPC) ; sorry to insist ; any chance of getting a copy
(download fine) ; thanks a lot .
Jack ; David ? ' it's listed in August Review ; Chairman 's on my back with
benchmarking ;
if you could rescue me ;
also a lot of folks on Net seems to be pondering over the opportunities
classifications .

Paul Klasek
http://www.resmed.com <http://www.resmed.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Klasek
Sent: Tuesday, 24 August 1999 14:04
To: 'TechNet E-Mail Forum.'; 'Cory & Lise'; [log in to unmask];
[log in to unmask]
Subject: RE: [TN] Method of : IPC-9261 draft



Could any of the IPC folks please throw more light on this DPMO draft ; and
how does it relate to existing models (Sirius, Motorola; etc.),
and if this draft is on the way to becoming ANSI standard .
Any European equivalents ? General models ?
Can we down load it ?

Fritz did I get your address right ?
Chris ; which way to get a copy of this draft ; did try

CEO 's got this (six sigma) "dream" and I 'd prefer to start on recognized
footing ( = standardized ops) .
Comparing apples with apples (what "standard" is in use now) ?

Thanks a lot

Paul Klasek
http://www.resmed.com <http://www.resmed.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: Cory & Lise [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, 24 August 1999 11:10
To: [log in to unmask]


Hello

I am in search of a standard that documents industry practice for
determining defect percentages.  Our company currently uses ppm calculated
from
 (# of defects) / (# of possible defects)

We are being asked by a customer to use
(# of defects) / (# of assemblies)

The numbers from the second calculation are much higher and do not give a
standardized view when comparing product A to product B.

Does anyone know of a standard that includes such information?

Thanks in advance,

Cory Steeby
[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
EBW Electronics, Inc.

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2