Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | TechNet E-Mail Forum. |
Date: | Tue, 17 Aug 1999 17:12:28 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Mr. Moon, Mr. Brummer, and all,
It appears that since we did not spec out the construction, our supplier
decided to provide us with the cheapest way, unbeknownst to us. We are
a small shop without a lot of engineering support. We typically rely on
our suppliers to steer us in the right direction. All our lay-ups are
conservative and on the high resin side. Former purchasing people here
put their trust 100% with the supplier to provide an equally
conservative construction. It appears that that did not happen. The
more I know, the more I need to know. Tough lesson learned.
Thanks for the input.
Anne
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Enter your name here [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 1999 7:40 PM
> To: TechNet E-Mail Forum.; Anne Ledger
> Subject: Re: [TN] Innerlayer issue
>
> Are you talking about weave impressions left from low resin to glass
> ratio
> materials? If you are, the answer is get away from using that nasty
> old
> 7628/7629 material facing foil. Go resin rich for no weave impressions
> and
> better innerlaminar bond strength with better resist adherence.
>
> Earl Moon
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Anne Ledger <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 1999 5:45 AM
> Subject: [TN] Innerlayer issue
>
>
> > Good Morning Technetters,
> >
> > I have a question for board fabbers. Problem: We are experiencing
> > weave texture on our innerlayer material. I have spoken to the
> > manufacturer who states that weave does shift in the "pour" of the
> > material (when the resin is added) and that there is no
> specification
> > that controls the depth requirement of the weave. The topography is
> > visual prior to lam/image. The condition is causing our resist to
> lift
> > slightly and allows an etch stain on the double treat foil that so
> far
> > we can not remove. Question: Is this a typical condition of
> innerlayer
> > material (other manufacturers)? Is it double treat foil only? Is
> there
> > a way to remove this type of etch stain? What is the acceptablity
> of
> > stain on inner layer foil? I can't find any reference info in IPC.
> >
> > Any and all input would be appreciated.
> >
> > Anne Ledger
> > EMDS, Inc.
> >
> > ##############################################################
> > TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV
> 1.8c
> > ##############################################################
> > To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with
> following text in
> > the body:
> > To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
> > To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF TECHNET
> > ##############################################################
> > Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for
> additional
> > information.
> > If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at
> [log in to unmask] or
> > 847-509-9700 ext.5365
> > ##############################################################
##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################
|
|
|