TECHNET Archives

August 1999

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jon Moore <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 26 Aug 1999 17:27:37 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
In a message dated 8/26/99 12:50:48 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:

<< I am currently evaluating what machine or process is better for Selective
 Soldering. >>

I have used, selective pallets on a wave, focused light beam soldering
(Panasonic) and selective dip soldering (Exselect).  All have good and bad
features.  I have also seen applications using a robotic point to point with
a soldering tip (JOT), as well as a robot that does oddform insertion and
soldering in the same cell (JOT).  They also worked well.  I would ask
several different vendors to solder actual product for you while you watch.
If you can't afford the travel, have each one solder your product and record
video of the process, then return the product and video to you for
comparisons.

Jon Moore

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2