TECHNET Archives

August 1999

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Davis, Mary M." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 31 Aug 1999 14:14:58 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
My apologies if this question is a repeat.  I sent it once but did not see
it posted or see any response so I am trying again.

I have run across an internal specification which applies an equivalency
factor to the maximum allowable limit for an Omegameter 300 and an
Omegameter 600 - but NOT to the maximum allowable limit for an Omegameter
500.  In other words, the maximum permissible micrograms NaCl eq./sq.cm. for
the Omegameter 500 is less than that for the Omegameter 300 and Omegameter
600.   Can anyone explain the logic for this?  Is the Omegameter 500
different?

Thanks in advance for your help.

Mary M. Davis
Eldec
425-743-8327

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2