TECHNET Archives

July 1999

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Sunil Gupta <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 27 Jul 1999 09:38:08 +0530
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (103 lines)
ERSA has introduced Ultrasonic wave soldering machine which doesnot require
flux for soldering.

Multicore has introduced a flux on which conformal coating can be done
without cleaning the boards.

regards

Sunil Gupta




"Hinners Hans CIV WRALC/LYPME" <[log in to unmask]> on 27-07-99
02:01:46

Please respond to "TechNet E-Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]>; Please respond
      to "Hinners Hans CIV WRALC/LYPME" <[log in to unmask]>

To:   [log in to unmask]
cc:    (bcc: Sunil Gupta/TTL)
Subject:  Re: [TN] No clean flux residue




Hi Ivan and All,

As you have discovered there really isn't a 'no clean' flux (at least with
'special' cases, yours - Probe; mine - Conformal Coating).  Somebody
correct
me if I'm wrong but you have a couple of choices - clean the probes, clean
the boards, or change the equipment/process (i.e.. change the way you test
and/or solder $$$).

The question I have for the group: Would soldering in an inert environment
remove the need for flux all together?  I would swear I have seen that
mentioned somewhere recently (where o where? - was it PC FAB or maybe
Precision Cleaning).

Hans

Air Force Material Command - We keep them flying!
~~~~~~~~
Hans M. Hinners                                 WR-ALC/LYPME Bldg. 640
Materials Engineer                                      380 Second Street,
Suite 104
Manufacturing Eng. Sec.                         Robins AFB GA 31098-1638
912-926-1970 (Voice) 468 - 1970 (DSN)   912-926-7974 (Fax)
[log in to unmask]


> Hello Technetters:
> Being new to the list, I do not know if this issue has been discussed in
> the
> past, so here goes. What can be done to minimize/eliminate the residue
> left by
> the no clean fluxes on the PCB's? We currently have a big issue with
> residue not
> allowing our test pin probes to make contact. We have implemented
cleaning
> the
> probes on a regular basis, but I want to eliminate the issue altogether.
> If this
> has been discussed, please point me in the right direction (archived
> responses).
> If not, I would really appreciate your help.
> Ivan Barrios
> Process Engineer
> Conexant Systems
> El Paso, TX,
>

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following
text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for
additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2