TECHNET Archives

July 1999

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Alan B. Cochrane" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 2 Jul 1999 06:46:54 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
Mike,
2 ply's of 106 will be much better.  The glass content is less and wil
require much less time to drill as well the hole quality will be much
smoother.

Regards,

Alan B. Cochrane
CTO
PCWorld


Mike Bailey wrote:
>
> I have a product that requires a .006 dia. laser ablated via from lyr 1 to
> 2.  I'm required to use glass re-inforced FR-4 as a dielectric.  The
> dielectric is approx .0035. I can either use a single ply of 2313 or 2 plies
> of 106 prepreg.  Which would be the most favorable construction in terms of
> laser hole quality and subsequent processing?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2