TECHNET Archives

July 1999

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Rudy Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Mon, 12 Jul 1999 22:09:12 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
At risk of telling you more than you wanted to know....

Apart from dry film issues, which I suspect are neglibly different, an
important difference in these two plating baths is that the Methane Sulfonate
baths will not dissolve the Stannic Tin oxide that inevitably forms when Tin
is plated, and it forms a milky white dispersion in the plating tank.

When the metal is plated, the oxide tends to co-deposit.  This oxide then can
create problems in fusing, if the boards are fused later on.  Clearly, this
is not an issue if the Tin is simply used as an etch resist.

Rudy Sedlak
RD Chemical Company

ATOM RSS1 RSS2