Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | Leadfree Electronics Assembly E-Mail Forum. |
Date: | Wed, 14 Jul 1999 17:17:51 +0100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
This is all true you will see a line between the solder and the termination coating for any material that does not become liquid
during normal soldering. Consider the first time you soldered to a Texas Instruments component with a palladium termination it did
not look like the standards but it was reliable.
The same variations can be seen on solderability testing times as well when using a wetting balance.
Bob Willis
Tel: (44) 01245 351502
Fax: (44) 01245 496123
Email: [log in to unmask]
Web Page: www.bobwillis.co.uk
Web Page: www.leadfreesoldering.com
Web Page: www.online4training.com
Europe's leading supplier of training products and training workshops
on electronic assembly and your guarantee of quality training.
-----Original Message-----
From: Larry Tawyea <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Date: 14 July 1999 16:24
Subject: Re: [LF] Solderability
>Andy,
>
>Everyone has a theory but hear is mine. Given that all things are equal in a
>soldering operation, except for the fact that you are compensating your
>processing temperatures for the difference in melting point temperatures,
>there is a difference between eutectic solder and high tin alloys that will
>effect the physical appearance. High tin solders have a much higher surface
>tension, approx. 20 to 30%, than eutectic tin lead solders. This will effect
>the wetting angle or the spread rate when viewed visually. I'm not sure how
>you are defining solderability since I have not followed the entire thread,
>but if you are using a visual criterion, this could be the reason why you are
>seeing a difference.
>
>Larry
>
>################################################################
>Leadfree E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
>################################################################
>To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask]
>with following text in the body:
>To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE Leadfree <your full name>
>To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF Leadfree
>################################################################
>IPCWorks -October 25-28 featuring an International Summit on Lead-Free Electronic
>Assemblies.
>Please visit IPC's Center for Lead-Free Electronics Assembly
>(http://www.ipc.org/html/leadfree.htm ) for additional information.
>For technical support contact Gayatri Sardeshpande [log in to unmask] or 847-790-5365.
>################################################################
>
################################################################
Leadfree E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask]
with following text in the body:
To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE Leadfree <your full name>
To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF Leadfree
################################################################
IPCWorks -October 25-28 featuring an International Summit on Lead-Free Electronic
Assemblies.
Please visit IPC's Center for Lead-Free Electronics Assembly
(http://www.ipc.org/html/leadfree.htm ) for additional information.
For technical support contact Gayatri Sardeshpande [log in to unmask] or 847-790-5365.
################################################################
|
|
|