LEADFREE Archives

June 1999

Leadfree@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Leadfree Electronics Assembly E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 25 Jun 1999 18:36:07 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (51 lines)
Hi Paul,
Your e-mail leads me to believe that I am walking in on an ongoing
conversation.
>What would the recommended or experienced alloys be ?
         What are you talking about?
>What papers/publications would be advised ?
         What are you talking about?
>Would this new alloys alter the existing reliability test guidelines (like
IPC-
>SM-785) to non applicability ;as most of the statistics were based on 63/37 ?
Seems you are talking about solders, maybe lead-free. The reliability test
guidelines are o.k., but some of the specifics may have to be somewhat
altered, because they are based on modeling the behavior of near-eutectic
Sn/Pb solders. Having said that, I need to point out that adequate
reliability data for lead-bearing solders other than near-eutectic Sn/Pb do
not exist either. Modifications to the model coefficients is only possible
with adequate data. However, the scarce data in existance for these solders
indicate factor of 2 differences from near-eutectic Sn/Pb fatigue; thus, the
errors introduced by different solders has been small so far. This may change
with lead-free solder alloys.
Neither the physics-of-failure nor the statistics for solder joint failures
will change, however.
Given the current tight (to none) resources at the OEMs and industry labs, I
am not very hopeful that the necessary work to develop models for the other
solders will be undertaken in the forseeable future.
>Would any other IPC ; MIL ; IEC standards require reconsiderations ?
Well, that depends, I am sure (not much help here).

Werner Engelmaier
Engelmaier Associates, L.C.
Electronic Packaging, Interconnection and Reliability Consulting
7 Jasmine Run
Ormond Beach, FL  32174  USA
Phone: 904-437-8747, Fax: 904-437-8737
E-mail: [log in to unmask], Website: www.engelmaier.com

################################################################
Leadfree E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask]
with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE Leadfree <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF Leadfree
################################################################
IPCWorks -October 25-28 featuring an International Summit on Lead-Free Electronic
Assemblies.
Please visit IPC's Center for Lead-Free Electronics Assembly
(http://www.ipc.org/html/leadfree.htm ) for additional information.
For technical support contact Gayatri Sardeshpande [log in to unmask] or 847-790-5365.
################################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2