TECHNET Archives

June 1999

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Subject:
From:
Richard Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 29 Jun 1999 11:34:22 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"TechNet E-Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
Hello all,

Since TechNet seems to be up and running better now, I will repost this
question. I apologize if this is a bother, however I am not sure it actually
got out before.

I am looking for acceptance and rejection criteria when measuring paste
highth, and area. If you use a .006" thick stencil should you expect a mound
that is .006" high and shaped as the aperture in the stencil? What tolerance
would be acceptable?

Is there any such criteria anywhere?

Thanks again for your assistance.

Richard Hamilton
Clemar Mfg. / Rain Bird
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2