DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

June 1999

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
DesignerCouncil <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
[log in to unmask]
Date:
Wed, 23 Jun 1999 16:57:10 -0700
Reply-To:
"DesignerCouncil E-Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]>, Mike Gish <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: PAD TO VIA SPACING
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From:
Mike Gish <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines) 
it's based on your minimum spacing requirements and current carrying
requirements
but there isn't a spec that describes a basic distance.  Keep in mind other
requirements also like design for testability and design for manufacturability

[log in to unmask] wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> Can anyone tell me if there is an IPC standard for spacing between a surface
> mount pad and a feedthru?
>
> Thanks,
> Mike W

ATOM RSS1 RSS2