TECHNET Archives

May 1999

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 7 May 1999 16:44:17 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
I wish I could remember all I forgot on this subject. I do
remember wishing I could count on normal copper oxidation
to do the job other processes should.

In my polyimide days, cuprous (is this the red stuff) was
used over cupric (is this the black stuff) to promote
inner laminar bond during relamination. Has double treat
(brass plating copper foil?) fulfilled its promise?

I guess I'm asking more questions than providing answers. I'm
just suprised the question persists.

Another frustration I have is when did the customer specify
a process? What happened to concurrent engineering. The master
drawing and specification used to call out only what was
acceptable - not how to make it happen.

Earl Moon

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet 
################################################################
Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line Services" section for additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
################################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2