TECHNET Archives

May 1999

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jorge Engenharia <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
"TechNet E-Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]>, Jorge Engenharia" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 17 May 1999 08:00:59 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (155 lines)
Ryan,

   Solder paste vendors has a rule that says:

   At least 5 balls must fit inside stencil apertures to have a good solder
paste release. ( good "brick" )

 <<...>>
   Based on that rule they recomend type 4 for ultra fine pitch, very
probably they conducted a laboratory experiments to achieve this conclusion.

Thanks

Jorge Dourado de Santana
Maintenance / Process Engr
Microtec - Brazil




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ryan Jennens [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 14 de Maio de 1999 18:21
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> Subject:      [TN] FW: [TN] FW: Fine Powder Solder Paste
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ryan Jennens [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Friday, May 14, 1999 5:21 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: RE: [TN] FW: Fine Powder Solder Paste
>
>
> Thanks, all, for the responses.  I was wondering if the type 4 paste would
> have value at pitches below 20 mil, say around 12 or 16.  If all I will
> get
> is more oxidation and worse release, does it offer any other advantages
> besides sharper corners and straighter sides on its deposits?
>
> -Ryan Jennens
> TelGen Corporation
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Friday, May 14, 1999 4:15 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask]
> Subject: RE: [TN] FW: Fine Powder Solder Paste
>
>
> Hey Ryan,
>
> As far as 20 mil printing is concerned I would say type 3 i.e (-325/+500)
> should be ok. If you go for type 4 ( i.e -400/+500 ) it has some issues
> like
> the particle size getting smaller will increase the surface area exposed
> to
> oxidation affecting the soldering quality. Also it would be expensive than
> type 3.
> If you are laready printing 20 mils with type 3, why you want to switch to
> trype 4?
> As far as more mass is concerned the volume of the paste will remain same
> irrespective of particle size.
>
> Thanks..
> Ashok
> SMT Engineer
> Solectron Corp.
> Milpitas
>
> > ----------
> > From:         Ryan Jennens[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> > Reply To:     TechNet E-Mail Forum.;Ryan Jennens
> > Sent:         Friday, May 14, 1999 11:11 AM
> > To:   [log in to unmask]
> > Subject:      [TN] FW: Fine Powder Solder Paste
> >
> >
> >
> >       -----Original Message-----
> >       From: Ryan Jennens [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> >       Sent: Thursday, May 13, 1999 11:51 AM
> >       To: TechNet
> >       Subject: Fine Powder Solder Paste
> >
> >
> >       What stencil design guidelines differ when one decides to go with
> >
> >       a -400/+500 particle size solder paste? The paste companies tout
> > that the
> >
> >       finer particle paste offers print improvements below 20 mil pitch.
> > But I
> >
> >       believe one would have to reduce the aperture sizes all around
> > because more
> >
> >       metal would be deposited in each one. Is this accurate? How much
> > reduction
> >
> >       is needed. Is home-plating the apertures even more important? I
> > could not
> >
> >       find this topic in the archives. We are considering switching for
> > our
> >
> >       finer-pitch boards, as their pitch decreases, if it really offers
> an
> >
> >       advantage. However, we have been printing 20-mil for a long time
> >
> >       with -325/+500 paste for quite a while.
> >
> >       -Ryan Jennens
> >
> >       TelGen Corporation
> >
> >
>
> ################################################################
> TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
> ################################################################
> To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with
> following text in the body:
> To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
> To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet
> ################################################################
> Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line Services"
> section for additional information.
> For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or
> 847-509-9700 ext.312
> ################################################################

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet
################################################################
Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line Services" section for additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
################################################################

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet 
################################################################
Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line Services" section for additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
################################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2