Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | TechNet E-Mail Forum. |
Date: | Wed, 5 May 1999 09:32:12 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Which is an interesting experimental concept. Why hasn't this been done?
If we can't agree on acceleration factors, why doesn't the industry do a DOE
with a leg or 2 being actual life and other legs being acceleration tests to
determine factors for different constructions/components/surface
finishes/.....
Or has this been done?
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Lamkin
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 1999 7:44 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Simulation of PCB ageing
You could always build a time machine, send them back 11& 3/4 months and
then they'll be ready next week. 8-)
><CUT>
>How to simulate a Pcb ageing equivalent to a one year storage ?
><CUT>
>
>
T.T.F.N
Matthew Lamkin
Printed Circuit Board Draughtsman
Protec Fire Detection PLC
Churchill Way,
Nelson, Lancs
BB9 6RT.
England U.K.
Tel 01282 717393
Fax 01282 717273
Email = [log in to unmask]
Company Web Site = http://www.protec-fire-detection.plc.uk
################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF TechNet
################################################################
Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line Services" section for additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
################################################################
|
|
|